IHS Inc. The Source for Critical Information and Insight
Aero - Defense |  Change

Advanced Search
 
 

FAA Issues Engineered Materials Arresting System (EMAS) Fact Sheet

December 29, 2006 // Published as a news service by IHS

 
Tools for Aviation/Aerospace
IHS sells products and services designed to meet the needs of today's engineers. To learn more, and for a free quote, please complete the form below.
Specs & Standards - Standards DB
AV DATA - Regs & compliance
IHS Fasteners eCatalog
HAYSTACK - Parts/logistics mgmt.
4DOnline - Component DB tools
TACTRAC - Obsolescence mgmt.
ESDU - Validated methods & data
First Name:

Last Name:

Email address:
The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requires commercial airports, regulated under FAA Part 139 safety rules, have a standard Runway Safety Area (RSA), where possible.

At most commercial airports the standard RSA is 500 feet wide and extends 1,000 feet beyond each end of the runway.

The RSA requirement is in place in case an aircraft overruns, undershoots or veers off the side of the runway.

According to the FAA, the most dangerous of these incidents are overruns, but since many airports were built before the 1,000-foot extension was adopted some 20 years ago, the area beyond the end of the runway is where many airports cannot achieve the full standard RSA, due to obstacles such as bodies of water, highways, railroads and populated areas or severe drop-off of terrain.

Even though the FAA provides federal funding to support RSAs at commercial airports, it still may not be practical for some airports to achieve the standard RSA. In the 1990s, the FAA began conducting research to determine how to ensure maximum safety at airports where the full RSA cannot be obtained.

Working with the University of Dayton, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, and the Engineered Arresting Systems Corporation (ESCO), a new technology emerged to provide an added measure of safety. An Engineered Materials Arresting System (EMAS) uses materials of closely controlled strength and density placed at the end of a runway to stop or greatly slow an aircraft that overruns the runway. To date, crushable concrete is the only system that meets FAA standards.

An EMAS arrestor bed causes a plane's tires to sink into the lightweight concrete upon impact. The aircraft is decelerated by having to roll through the material, the FAA said.

EMAS Technology Benefits
According to the FAA, EMAS technology provides safety benefits in cases where land is not available or where it would be very expensive for the airport sponsor to buy the land off the end of the runway.

The EMAS technology also provides an added measure of safety at airports where it is not possible to have the standard 1,000-foot overrun. EMAS is in place at 14 U.S. airports and on 21 runways. Installation is on tap at four additional airports.

A standard EMAS installation extends 600 feet from the end of the runway. An EMAS arrestor bed can be installed to help slow or stop an aircraft that overruns the runway, even if less than 600 feet of land is available.

The FAA Office of Airports prepared its RSA improvement plan for the runways at roughly 575 commercial airports in 2005. The plan enables the agency to track the progress and to direct federal funds for making all practicable improvements, including the use of EMAS technology.

EMAS Arrestments
The technology prevented aircraft from overrunning the runway in three incidents. In several other cases, the technology prevented injury to passengers and damage to the aircraft, including:

  • May 1999 - A Saab 340 commuter aircraft overran the runway at JFK.
  • May 2003 - Gemini Cargo MD-11 was safely decelerated at JFK.
  • January 2005 - A Boeing 747 overran the runway at JFK.
  • July 2006 - Mystere Falcon 900 airplane ran off the runway at the Greenville Downtown Airport in South Carolina.

EMAS Installations

Airport

Location

# of Systems

Installation Date

JFK International Jamaica, NY
1
1996
Minneapolis St. Paul Minneapolis, MN
1
1999
Little Rock Little Rock, AR
2
2000/2003
Rochester International Rochester, NY
1
2001
Burbank Burbank, CA
1
2002
Baton Rouge Metropolitan Baton Rouge, LA
1
2002
Greater Binghamton Binghamton, NY
2
2002
Greenville Downtown Greenville, SC
1
2003
Barnstable Municipal Hyannis, MA
1
2003
Roanoke Regional Roanoke, VA
1
2004
Fort Lauderdale International Fort Lauderdale, FL
2
2004
Dutchess County Poughkeepsie, NY
1
2004
LaGuardia Flushing, NY
2
2005
Boston Logan Boston, MA
2
2006
Laredo International Laredo, TX
1
2006
San Diego International San Diego, CA
1
2006

Additional Projects Under Contract

Location

# of Systems Expected Installation Date
Charleston, WV
1

Fall 2006

Cordova, AK
1

April 2007

Teterboro, NJ
1

December 2006

Chicago Midway
1

2007

Source: U. S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

AEROSPACE & DEFENSE ENGINEERING STANDARDS NEWS
August 25, 2008
ABI: Security Biometrics Spending to Reach $7.3B in 2013
According to ABI Research, broad interest and investment in an array of biometrics technologies around the world will drive biometrics spending ... more
August 15, 2008
EC Publishes Aviation Security Rules
On August 8, the European Commission (EC) decided to make the majority of rules relating to aviation security available to the public. ... more
August 14, 2008
DHS Releases National Emergency Communications Plan for Emergency Responders
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released the National Emergency Communications Plan (NECP) to help address gaps and determine ... more
August 13, 2008
ASIS Int'l to Develop Business Continuity Management, Risk Assessment Standards
ASIS International will develop a business continuity management standard based on the ASIS Business Continuity Guideline and a risk assessment ... more
August 13, 2008
ASIS Int'l Issues Draft Guideline for Facilities Physical Security Measures
The ASIS Commission on Standards and Guidelines released a draft of the Facilities Physical Security Measures Guideline. ... more
Show All..